Большая просьба: ничего не обсуждать.
Васи больше нет. Абсурд, в голове не укладывается. Но это факт.
Досужие домыслы и прочее ни к чему.
А здесь им вовсе не место.
Михаил Васильевич держался так, что достоен преклонения.
Сегодня, 21 июля, 80 летний отец везет прах сына через пол-земли.
Вот такой страшный путь
И впереди остаток жизни без единственного сына и с постоянным вопросом: почему?.
Об этом всем не стоит говорить.
Об этом лучше молчать.
Works by Vassili Kryukov
Books
Ritualnaya kommunikaciya v drevnem Kitae [Ritual Communication in ancient China]. Moscow-Taibei: Institut Vostokovedenija RAN, 1997.
Tekst i ritual. Opyt interpretazii drevnekitaiskoy epigrafiki epohi Yin-Zhou [Text and Ritual. An Attempt of Interepretation of Early Chinese Epigraphy of Yin-Zhou epoch], Moscow: Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2000.
Papers
Liu Huaxia 劉華夏, Liu Kefu 劉克甫 (Mikhail Kryukov), “Bo, zhong, shu, ji yu Xi Zhou Jin shi xi” (“伯”、“仲”、“叔”、“季”與西周晉侯世系), Kaogu No. 4 (2008): 72-77.
“Symbols of Power and Communication in Pre-Confucian China (on the Anthropology of De): Preliminary Assumptions,” BSOAS 58 (1995): 314-33.
“Novye arheologicheskie otkrytiya v KNR” [New archaeological discoveries in PRC], Vestnik drevnei istorii No. 1 (1989).
“Nadpisi na zapadnozhouskih bronzovyh sosudah iz Fufena (KNR)” [Inscriptions on bronze vessels of Western Zhou time from Fufeng (PRC)], Vestnik drevnei istorii No.1 (1988).
“Dary zemnye I nebesnye (k simvolike arhaicheskogo rituala v rannezhouskom Kitae” [Earthly and Heavenly Gifts (on the symbolic of archaic ritual in early Zhou China)], in Etika i ritual v tradizionnom Kitae [Ethics and ritual in traditional China], ed. By L.S. Vassil’ev, Moscow: Nauka, 1988.
“Simvolika kommunikazii v arhaicheskom rituale I ee pereosmyslenie v filosofskih tradiziyah drevnego Kitaya” [Symbolic of communication in archaic ritual and its rethinking in philosophical traditions of ancient China], XVIII research conference “Society and State in China”, Part 1, Moscow: Institut Vostokovedeniya RAN, 1987.
“O pervonachal’noi semantike de” [On the original semantic of de], XVII research conference “Society and State in China”, Part 1, Moscow: Institut Vostokovedeniya RAN, 1986.
“Chelovecheskie zhertvoprinosheniya v drevnem Kitae: ozenki I interpretazii v istoriografii KNR” [Human sacrifices in ancient China: evaluations and interpretations in PRC historiography], in Obschestvennye nauki za rubezhom (seriya K)4 [Social sciences abroad, (K series), 4], Moscow: Akademiya nauk SSSR, 1985.
“Voennye pohody v sisteme sozial’nyh otnoshenii drevnekitaiskogo obschestva konza 2-go – nachala 1-go tys. do n. e.” [Military campaigns in the system of social relations of the ancient Chinese society of late 2nd- early 1st millennium BC], XVI research conference “Society and State in China”, Part 1, Moscow: Institut Vostokovedeniya RAN, 1985.
“Evolyuziya pogrebal’nogo obryada v arhaicheskom Kitae: sozial’nyi I etnicheskii aspekty” [Evolution of the funerary ritual in archaic China: social and ethnic aspects], in Etnicheskaya kul’tura: dinamica osnovnyh elementov [Ethnic culture: dynamics of principal elements], ed. By M.I. Krupnik, Moscow: Institut Istorii SSSR, 1984.
“Pogrebal’nyi obryad v arhaicheskom Kitae I problemy formirovaniya rangovoi ierarhii” [Funerary ritual in archaic China and the problems of the establishment of the hierarchy of ranks], XV research conference “Society and State in China”, Part 1, Moscow: Institut Vostokovedeniya RAN, 1984.
“Sistema darenii i ee evolyuziya v Kitae epohi Zhou” [The system of Gifts and its evolution during the Zhou epoch], in XIV nauchnaya konferenziya “Obschestvo I gosudarstvo v Kitae” [hereafter “research conference ‘Society and State in China’”], Part 1, Moscow: Institut Vostokovedeniya RAN, 1983.
has written several books on Russian literature.
Нет.
Он не был руссистом. Он был КИТАИСТОМ, исследователем текстов на древней бронзе